‘Twelve Angry Men is less about guilt or innocence than about reasonable doubt.’ Discuss Set in s New York with a backdrop of post McCarthyism hysteria, Reginald Rose’s Twelve Angry Men explores the deliberations of a jury in a homicide trial Sep 01, · The movie “Twelve Angry Men” is a film about twelve jurors in a murder trial deliberating the guilt or acquittal of a defendant on the idea of cheap doubt. All of the jurors come from very different backgrounds and see issues in very different perspectives. This essay shall be analyzing the group discussion that was dramatized within the film Apr 18, · 12 Angry Men is an American film directed by Sidney Lumet, based on a screenplay from the TV show by Reginald Rose. The film was produced by Westinghouse Studio One and was first released in The film’s genre is a courtroom drama, and its plot takes place mainly in the same set – jury room A
12 Angry Men Essay Examples (Topics, Prompts and Questions) - Free Analysis Essays
The film was produced by Westinghouse Studio One and was first released in At the beginning of the film, the viewer sees a 12 angry men essays, whom the judge asks to 12 angry men essays or acquit an year-old accused who allegedly killed his father. The judge asks the jury to make the decision based on reasonable doubt or lack of 12 angry men essays. Over the next hour, the jury debates the verdict, 12 angry men essays, trying to determine if there is sufficient evidence that the defendant committed the murder. This paper aims to discuss the movie in the context of group behavior forms, namely group decision making, communication, leadership, and conflict and negotiation.
Conventionally, the film can be divided into several acts, symbolizing the turning points when the jury changes their minds. In the first act, the jury, tired of lengthy court hearings, enters the decision-making room, stretches their legs, and gets to know each other. Therefore, the discussion initiated by juror 8, who took on the 12 angry men essays of leader, reveals another juror with leadership qualities — juror 4. Communication also helps to identify the main antagonists — juror 7. who is in a rush to a football match; juror 3, who confessed that his son once hit him; and juror 10, who is aggressive and fanatical and later turns out to have racial prejudice against the accused.
The group is not ready for teamwork but understands the need to make a joint decision. Many are not 12 angry men essays to easily convict an innocent, so they accept the invitation of juror 8 to communicate. However, in the first act, the conflict has not yet matured, so negotiations have no basis. Most of the jurors consider the young man guilty, except for juror 9, the older man, who takes the side of juror 8 12 angry men The boy said he lost his knife, and fingerprints were erased from the knife found at the scene of the murder. Therefore, juror 8 asked to bring the knife, and when juror 4 again tried to convince the jury that this knife belonged to the accused, juror 8 pulled out the same knife from his pocket.
No one has ideas regarding the guilt of the young man, which plunges neutral and sympathetic juries into a kind of lethargy. Simultaneously, the antagonists are very active; they play on the weaknesses, resort to aggression and intimidation, and do not give strong arguments. Overall, the behavior of jurors 4 and 8 as informal group leaders is respectable, 12 angry men essays. Juror 9 also has the makings of a leader but lacks the inner strength or oratorical talent to convince others of his opinion. Further, during the discussion, juror 8 proposes to conduct an investigative experiment. The experiment confirmed that the first witness, an older man with sore legs, would not cover the distance from the bed to the door in 15 seconds, which indicated that he could only hear someone running down the stairs.
Discouraged by the new turn, juror 3 threatens to kill juror 8 if he does not stop, to which juror 8 replies that juror 3 probably does not mean it. Juror 8, as the already recognized leader, continues to push the group to participate in the discussion and says that the first witness could not hear the sound of the fallen body. According to the second witness, a locomotive was passing along the street at that moment, which would have drowned out any sounds. Juror 8 also says that the victim was 16 inches taller than the accused but was stabbed from top to bottom.
The antagonist juror 3 demonstrates that this is possible. But then juror 5, who grew up in the slums, explains that if the accused knew how to use a knife, he would strike from the bottom up, 12 angry men essays. Therefore, juror 8 sows doubt on the jury board, and juror 1 proposes to vote again. The votes are evenly divided this time, but juror 8 ran out of arguments, 12 angry men essays, as juror 4 says that the second witness saw the boy kill his father from a nearby house across the street. However, juror 9 suddenly recalls that the second witness was wearing glasses when she testified in the courtroom. It convinces juror 4 and other jurors, and juror 3 remains the only antagonist who gives up soon.
Therefore, the movie demonstrates that one person can change the result of a group decision if he treats the group carefully and with respect and if there are potential supporters in the group. Thus, the movie was discussed in terms of group behavior forms, namely, 12 angry men essays, group decision-making, communication, leadership, conflict, and negotiation. None of the leaders had prejudices; on the contrary, the leaders tried to convey arguments to the group members honestly and resisted the antagonists. This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly.
If you are the original creator of 12 angry men essays paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. Learn More. Fashion as Performance — The Ballets Russes. Cite this paper Select style. Select citation styles APA-6 APA-7 MLA-8 Chicago N-B Chicago A-D Harvard. Reference StudyCorgi. Bibliography StudyCorgi. References StudyCorgi. Powered by CiteChimp - the best free reference generator. Copy to clipboard.
12 Angry Men - The Impact Of Reasonable Doubt
, time: 4:4212 Angry Men Critical Essay - blogger.com
Aug 03, · admin August 3, “12 Angry Men” EssayThe movie “12 Angry Men” focuses on a jury’s decision on a capital murder case. A man jury is sent to begin decisions on the first-degree murder trial of an year-old Latino accused of stabbing his father to death, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence Apr 18, · 12 Angry Men is an American film directed by Sidney Lumet, based on a screenplay from the TV show by Reginald Rose. The film was produced by Westinghouse Studio One and was first released in The film’s genre is a courtroom drama, and its plot takes place mainly in the same set – jury room A 12 Angry Men Essay Words | 6 Pages year laws have significantly changed around the world. In New York’s penalty for 1st degree murder was the death sentence. In order for an accused to be convicted 12 jurors must come to a unanimous consensus of a guilty verdict
No comments:
Post a Comment